brad
@brad@posiwid.net
The #Flock cameras in the local #Seaside #California Home Depot parking lot got cut down overnight.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1416333486418080/permalink/1850974092954015
(picture from the FB post in case that post disappears)
One of the most important things I learned at Mozilla was the idea of an explicit “priority of constituencies”; that is, if you have responsibilities to different groups for different reasons, being clear and honest up front about who is at the front of the line and why. As with The Tyranny Of Structurelessness, there’s always a hierarchy, and letting those hierarchies stay hidden means letting power escape scrutiny.
The thing that saddens me about so many developments in Linux, at every level - from SystemD and the Wayland permission model up to snaps and flatpak and now apparently the kernel - is that these priorities are, obviously to me at least, not spelled out explicitly because saying so out loud would be too obviously repulsive. Because today the primary constituencies of Linux are cloud and corporate fleet rentiers first, their developers second and human computer owners a distant third at best.
@mhoye This has more or less always been true but in my experience, there was a period where recruiters and hiring managers were more or less explicitly saying "we need to do right by our customers (the cloud rentiers or their near equivalents) but the great thing about open source is there's this huge positive externality for the community that we get to contribute to"
but then someone in finance realized that "positive externality" is a way of saying "breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders"
@glyph @mhoye One of my less popular opinions was that the liberatory potential of computers was always limited, because the bounds of what a computer can do were always set by how much computing power it could marshal, which was another way of saying that they were bounded by money. Everyone could have as much liberation as they could afford. And the rich, powerful and evil would always be able to afford more than the marginalized, dispossessed and oppressed.
This is part of why people stopped inviting me to speak at conferences
"oh yeah lets just totally squander this opportunity to use my position of influence to at least nudge things a tiny bit into a positive direction"
@mntmn George Lucas too... these men find more value in presenting that they are ahead of the pack, than any value system or sparing a single post-colonial thought.
@mntmn so fucking exhausting. but not surprising considering how he already slid into open jingoism a year or two ago, together with greg kh
@whitequark @mntmn Linus is just a tool
@ratsnakegames @mntmn I'm not sure if he used to be better and is slowly getting brainrot, or he was always like this
@whitequark @ratsnakegames @mntmn He was pretty much always like that. I mean, LKML being ultra toxic didn't originated out of thin air
@tragivictoria @whitequark @ratsnakegames well, this gave me some real hope back then, but it wasn't actually on the lkml (misremembered) https://social.kernel.org/objects/60bcac97-e7c7-4899-a1b6-bb72196cddaf
@mntmn @tragivictoria @ratsnakegames huh, that's... a big U-turn
@whitequark @tragivictoria @ratsnakegames yeah. i guess this post was more important for linux than linus realizes
it doesn't make any sense. linux and the gpl have no technical reason to exist. one could've just bought a copy of unix, right? oh, some people couldn't afford unix, or wanted a bit more control about their own computers? "well that's a you problem" or what. remember the bill gates borg memes in the 1990s? remember "linux is a cancer"? but now it's totally fine to get assimilated by anthropic, which is the new microsoft btw. hello mcfly, anybody home?
@mntmn thousands of people across the world, universities, companies.. they all just really like Linus Torvalds and they just think Tux is very cute, absolutely nothing social to inspect here
/sar
if you depend on a secret machine, whose usage you rent from a secret factory, to write your code, you have become the downstream of an oracle that is now in control of you, it has become the new landlord of your skill, and you have also become its little pay piggie
(sorry for revealing so many of my actual feelings today, i'm just a bit upset with things)
@mntmn it's kinda nice to hear, and i don't mean "rage". there's this whole social hegemony thing about this hype that I don't want to take part in.
@mntmn I'm glad.
these days I think it's necessary for tech project leaders to report their "actual feelings", right in the documentation.
as a user, I want to know whether or not, one day years down the line, I'll find I was inadvertently supporting a fascist the whole time I was using some project.
I'm really suffering these days from constantly needing to switch away from projects when the leaders finally show their cards. "woke" projects are lower maintenance.
other tech companies leader revealing feelings online: AH FUCK I liked this company! now i have to spend time looking for an alternative because the leader totally suck and makes me angry and sad. i don`t want to support this even if their product is working very well.
mnt leader revealing feelings online: hell yeah. this aligns perfectly with why i wanted to invest in the product of this company.
@mntmn I agree strongly with this, but I don't think that is what's (currently) happening in the kernel. Linus' email was sent in the context of an AI powered patch review bot.
@Bubu yes, although i still need to look in more detail at these https://asta.boserup.eu/forest/kompromat/#llm-linux
@mntmn It's almost as if owning the means of production is important or something. Someone should write a book on that...
@mntmn Or maybe....
we are democratising FOSS, exploiting the free and paid tools to:
- learn how to do things in a very short time
- document and explain tools of the trade
- become independent and make our own stuff
- securing our infrastructure using low-effort warnings
- enjoy making for oneself, or be it à la Heath Robinson
Nothing comes close in positive effects of a properly used tool. Lazy, damaging usage is a human foible, not a fault of the landlord or tool vendor.
@mntmn thank goodness for open source models. You can download them, see exactly how they work, understand them, and even re-train them.
@jim__ but as far as i know there are no seriously usable ones with open training data, and it's not what the linux kernel people are using either. but i also think that this whole mess of "needing" a fuzzy llm to find security bugs, which often (still) turn out to be some sort of buffer overflows, is because it's a giant 90s-style C code base that can't be formally verified (afaik)
@mntmn I think training data is always going to be contentious; models benefit from using as much of the internet as possible - but not everyone opted in. Who knows how the best-performing open source models were really trained; possibly distilled from OpenAI’s? But for me they are a whole lot less problematic than closed remote models.
@mntmn my impression of early Linux history is that Linus became an Important Person completely by accident
@mntmn
Even for people wanting a unix-like operating system free of charge in the mid-1990s, FreeBSD was an objectively better alternative. But a lot of really good programmers chose Linux for political reasons, and made it better.
I still run FreeBSD on my home server. I have considered switching because it would make things easier with docker and systemd, but by now I'm kind of happy I haven't.
@mntmn in my software dev career, since 2005 or so, I often heard from fellow devs that "open source is just a business model".
at the time I thought this was a cynical and greedy view. and also silly. do these people also think a bird is just a shitty fish?
I should have taken it as a warning. the industry would never stop until open source WAS part of the business model.
if someone says a bird is just a shitty fish, maybe they intend to flood the world
@mntmn This is something that has been bugging me about the whole AI/LLM for a while know: When I first dabbled in programming I was messing a around in some weird windows based ecosystem, where one would need to pay for IDEs, compilers or other tools (or "borrow" them from friends). I even bought a licence for a compiler, because I wanted to sell one of the small tools I made and needed an above board way to build the binaries.
Then I stumbled upon that Linux thing and it changed everything. The barrier of entry for writing software went from buy/obtain all these weird proprietary tools, to here's a free CD put it into any second hand computer and you can start making cool stuff. (I'd put something about the means of production here, but the wouldn't be appropriate as Linux is apparently not a political project...)
Now more and more codebases have a lot of LLM generated code in them and the documentation is intended to onboard agents instead of new contributors. At least from my point of view the barrier of entry to making software will soon be: Pick one of these providers and pay them a monthly fee to access their LLM code generator thing.
That's pretty much the antithesis of what got me into Linux and open source in general.
@mntmn
IMO Linus has relinquished the right to make purely-technical decisions when Linux adopted the CoC.
@mntmn I think the youths don't appreciate the sense in which the early internet was about *emancipation*. It seems like they all prefer the chains now.
@mntmn open source software, the GPL and the Linux kernel: anti capitalist projects that were slowly and then rapidly taken over by black tar capitalism.
@mntmn This is why it's so important to remember that Linux was a toy project that became popular, but was never driven by software freedom concerns.
Linus chose the GPL without much thought, never cared about these ideals, and has long been far too accomodating to e.g. Qualcomm.
Instead it was (despite their flaws) the GNU project that pushed for free software and software freedom rights, fought against tivoization and for the right to repair, since before Linux even existed.
@mntmn what drives me nuts is this essence of "it's just a tool". That's such a limited, reductive, narrow minded etc. view on LLMs that I'm honestly not sure how one can say that in good conscience and with more than 5 minutes of thought.
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO
Want some reminders of how fucking terrible this idea is?
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/true-cost-solar-power-night-reflect-orbital/
https://darksky.org/news/organizational-statement-reflect-orbital/
Journalists: please write about how dangerous this is.
Lawyers (especially if you're based in the US): please help fight this, it will take legal action now
GREAT guess I'm not going to sleep tonight either. Maybe there will be auroras. I need to enjoy the night sky as much as I can now, I guess.
Fuck you, FCC, for approving this. Fuck Reflect Orbital and all the copycats it's going to spawn. Fuck techbros everywhere. Fuck venture capitalists for funding this destructive, useless bullshit.
Yet another article submitted for The Conversation, with some last minute modifications to express how fucking terrible the FCC's decision on Reflect Orbital is, which fit in perfectly with the overall theme of the article.
(How many articles in The Conversation is too many? I think this is my 5th this year. Every single one about different aspects of how techbros are destroying things in orbit)
I just reached out to a bunch of journalists who already wrote about how awful Reflect Orbital is. I hope at least some of them will write more about it.
(Please DM me if you have suggestions for journalists I should reach out to who might be interested in writing about this to a large audience)
RE: https://beige.party/@adub/116896129245194088
Oh fantastic, the FCC approved Reflect Orbital on Matariki. Just to make it more hideously disrespectful to absolutely everything.
Relatedly, I got interviewed months ago as one of 3 experts for this Aotearoa-based podcast that just came out, which talks about Matariki, access to the sky, and how bad the situation is in orbit: https://linktr.ee/kpcnz
As conflicts and division dominate news headlines around the world, Professor Rangi Mātāmua (Tūhoe), said Matariki sends this message:
"Like the ocean connects us, the sky connects us, and we are connected to each other. And these are unusual, difficult times for many of us, we need each other more than we probably understand. We are all related, we come from the same place, and we actually come from the stars." https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/pacific/696510/matariki-s-message-for-the-pacific-we-need-each-other-more-than-we-understand
A New York Times journalist just interviewed me about Reflect Orbital! And I've got an interview for Scientific American set up for Monday. Excellent.
Reflect Orbital is going to launch a giant fucking mirror into orbit.
SpaceX has asked to launch a million gigantic fucking orbital data centers, and they've already got 11,000 sats in orbit.
The UN website that allows everyone to see what new satellites have been launched has not been updated since February. https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vqtp5dj2o6rqnge56sz2db5a/post/3mq7fzllgw22h
And tomorrow, we're going to run out of satellite catalogue numbers, Y2K in orbit: https://celestrak.org/
Time to go for a walk in the woods...
Well, I thought this was getting published next week, but it's out now!
Come read about Weird Space Stuff, sponsored by Reflect Orbital and the FCC (who both suck massively)
I LOVE waking up on a Saturday morning and thinking about nothing but Reflect Orbital and how to fight it. And then sending lots of emails and texts to my many astronomer colleagues who woke up similarly angry this morning.
The one thing that gives me hope is that 99.9% of people who find out about this react by saying some variant of "Wow that's such a stupid, useless, destructive idea." We have to figure out how to leverage that sentiment.
Fuck you, Reflect Orbital. I will keep fighting.
McSweeney's on "AI finances" goes harder than most business publications.
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/ai-economics-for-dummies
Is AI funded by the fossil fuel industry as a new element of an intergenerational trust?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-06/saudis-plan-100-billion-ai-powerhouse-to-rival-uae-s-tech-hub
So much about the AI fraud is reminiscent of JP Getty's money shuffle, where paper losses, tax evasion, & fraud go hand in hand.
There's no such thing as a perpetual motion machine. There's no such thing as a perpetual money machine either.
1. Oil fields
2. Shipping
3. Refineries
4. Gas stations
5. Hotels & housing
6. Getty Trust
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aCSga0_K1r8
1/
@tante New loans must be created, even if it’s against all things that make sense. Loans are the only way to create new money.
Without creating new money stock prices that aren’t reflective of anything real can’t keep going up.
Ps. Stocks are mostly bought with loans, not cash. The leveraged routinely exceed 10:1.
Pps. The inflation trickles down to us.
@tante Meanwhile I'm overhere stashing as much popcorn as I can and selling at a premium when the bubble finally bursts.🍿
California and Colorado legislated that Linux distributions, being free and open-source, are exempt from the age verification in operating systems, unless they are proprietary like SteamOS (and Windows).
Too bad the systemd developers already complied with fascism in advance before the bills were even finalized.
Will Lennart Poettering and his followers now please remove the birthDate field from systemd?
P.S.: If you reply with any variation of "You need to calm down," I will block you.
google had to level up by killing RSS and XMPP before they could gain enough XP to kill email.
once they're done with that they will move on to the final boss of killing the web.
“I Did Not Come to This Kids Party for an AI Sermon - Justin Ribeiro, Ph.D.”
https://justinribeiro.com/chronicle/2026/05/21/i-did-not-come-to-this-kids-party-for-an-ai-sermon/
"The old world of tech is dying and the new cannot be born"
https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2026/the-old-world-of-tech-is-dying/
This ones leans a bit more into theory and politics than I usually do when writing about the industry, but this moment in time warrants it, I think.
Today #CERN released its #KiCad component library to the public.
They are licensed CERN-OHL-P-2.0
Thank you OSPO ❤️ for getting this done.
Originally the library is made in Altium and will also be maintained in Altium. The repo only contains files that have been automatically converted.
It is a database library which contains only fully specified parts. There are lots of weird connectors. Have fun exploring.
https://home.cern/computing/cerns-kicad-component-library-now-open-source/
Yesterday a colleague from GNU shared this great link about "Free/Open Source Software tainted by LLM developers/developed by genAI boosters, along with alternatives."👇